Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 136(5): 571-577, 2023 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given that seizures may be triggered by vaccination, this study aimed to evaluate the risk and correlative factors of seizures in patients with epilepsy (PWE) after being vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled PWE who were vaccinated against COVID-19 in the epilepsy centers of 11 hospitals in China. We divided the PWE into two groups as follows: (1) patients who developed seizures within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SAV (with seizures after vaccination) group; (2) patients who were seizure-free within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SFAV (seizure-free after vaccination) group. To identify potential risk factors for seizure reccurence, the binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Besides, 67 PWE who had not been vaccinated were also included for elucidating the effects of vaccination on seizures recurrence, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether vaccination would affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had drug reduction or withdrawal. RESULTS: The study included a total of 407 patients; of which, 48 (11.8%) developed seizures within 14 days after vaccination (SAV group), whereas 359 (88.2%) remained seizure-free (SFAV group). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of seizure freedom ( P  < 0.001) and withdrawal from anti-seizure medications (ASMs) or reduction in their dosage during the peri-vaccination period were significantly associated with the recurrence of seizures (odds ratio = 7.384, 95% confidence interval = 1.732-31.488, P  = 0.007). In addition, 32 of 33 patients (97.0%) who were seizure-free for more than three months before vaccination and had a normal electroencephalogram before vaccination did not have any seizures within 14 days of vaccination. A total of 92 (22.6%) patients experienced non-epileptic adverse reactions after vaccination. Binary logistic regression analysis results showed that vaccine did not significantly affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had the behavior of ASMs dose reduction or withdrawal ( P  = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS: PWE need protection from the COVID-19 vaccine. PWE who are seizure-free for >3 months before vaccination should be vaccinated. Whether the remaining PWE should be vaccinated depends on the local prevalence of COVID-19. Finally, PWE should avoid discontinuing ASMs or reducing their dosage during the peri-vaccination period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Vaccination
2.
Front Immunol ; 13: 984789, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198860

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Several COVID-19 vaccines list "uncontrolled epilepsy" as a contraindication for vaccination. This consequently restricts vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with epilepsy (PWE). However, there is no strong evidence that COVID-19 vaccination can exacerbate conditions in PWE. This study aims to determine the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on PWE. Methods: PWE were prospectively recruited from 25 epilepsy centers. We recorded the seizure frequency at three time periods (one month before the first vaccination and one month after the first and second vaccinations). A generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) was used for analysis, and the adjusted incidence rate ratio (AIRR) with 95% CI was presented and interpreted accordingly. Results: Overall, 859 PWE were included in the analysis. Thirty-one (3.6%) and 35 (4.1%) patients were found to have increased seizure frequency after the two doses, respectively. Age had an interaction with time. The seizure frequency in adults decreased by 81% after the first dose (AIRR=0.19, 95% CI:0.11-0.34) and 85% after the second dose (AIRR=0.16, 95% CI:0.08-0.30). In juveniles (<18), it was 25% (AIRR=0.75, 95% CI:0.42-1.34) and 51% (AIRR=0.49, 95% CI:0.25-0.95), respectively. Interval between the last seizure before vaccination and the first dose of vaccination (ILSFV) had a significant effect on seizure frequency after vaccination. Seizure frequency in PWE with hereditary epilepsy after vaccination was significantly higher than that in PWE with unknown etiology (AIRR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.17-3.24). Two hundred and seventeen (25.3%) patients experienced non-epileptic but not serious adverse reactions. Discussion: The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine does not significantly increase seizure frequency in PWE. The limitations of vaccination in PWE should focus on aspects other than control status. Juvenile PWE should be of greater concern after vaccination because they have lower safety. Finally, PWE should not reduce the dosage of anti-seizure medication during the peri-vaccination period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Vaccination/adverse effects
4.
Anal Methods ; 13(45): 5418-5435, 2021 11 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1521868

ABSTRACT

The global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) virus indiscriminately impacted people worldwide with unquantifiable and severe impacts on all aspects of our lives, regardless of socioeconomic status. The pandemic brought to light the very real possibility of pathogens changing and shaping the way we live, and our lack of preparedness to deal with viral/bacterial outbreaks. Importantly, the quick detection of pathogens can help prevent and control the spread of disease, making the importance of diagnostic techniques undeniable. Point-of-care diagnostics started as a supplement to standard lab-based diagnostics, and are gradually becoming mainstream. Because of this, and their importance in detecting pathogens (especially in the developing world), their development has accelerated at an unprecedented rate. In this review, we highlight some important and recent examples of point-of-care diagnostics for detecting nucleic acids, proteins, bacteria, and other biomarkers, with the intent of making apparent their positive impact on society and human health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Pandemics , Point-of-Care Systems , Point-of-Care Testing
5.
Am J Chin Med ; 49(2): 237-268, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1365230

ABSTRACT

Intestinal flora is essential for maintaining host health and plays a unique role in transforming Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). TCM, as a bodyguard, has saved countless lives and maintained human health in the long history, especially in this COVID-19 pandemic. Pains of diseases have been removed from the effective TCM therapy, such as TCM preparation, moxibustion, and acupuncture. With the development of life science and technology, the wisdom and foresight of TCM has been more displayed. Furthermore, TCM has been also inherited and developed in innovation to better realize the modernization and globalization. Nowadays, intestinal flora transforming TCM and TCM targeted intestinal flora treating diseases have been important findings in life science. More and more TCM researches showed the significance of intestinal flora. Intestinal flora is also a way to study TCM to elucidate the profound theory of TCM. Processing, compatibility, and properties of TCM are well demonstrated by intestinal flora. Thus, it is no doubt that intestinal flora is a core in TCM study. The interaction between intestinal flora and TCM is so crucial for host health. Therefore, it is necessary to sum up the latest results in time. This paper systematically depicted the profile of TCM and the importance of intestinal flora in host. What is more, we comprehensively summarized and discussed the latest progress of the interplay between TCM and intestinal flora to better reveal the core connotation of TCM.


Subject(s)
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Autoimmune Diseases/microbiology , Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases/microbiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Electroacupuncture , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Humans , Metabolic Diseases/microbiology , Metabolic Diseases/therapy , Neoplasms/microbiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/microbiology , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/therapy , Obesity/microbiology , Obesity/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/microbiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Affect Disord ; 277: 510-514, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To our best knowledge, this was the first time to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of psychological disturbances, including depression, anxiety, somatization symptoms, insomnia and suicide, among frontline medical staff, who were working with the COVID-10 infected patients directly. METHODS: Patient Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire scale (GAD-7), Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90) somatization, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the suicidal module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview were used for online survey. RESULTS: A total of 606 frontline hospital staff and1099 general population were recruited. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, somatization symptoms, insomnia, and suicide risk in frontline medical staffs were 57.6%, 45.4%, 12.0%, 32.0% and 13.0%, respectively. Except for suicide risk, the prevalence of other psychological disorders in frontline medical staff were higher than those in general population (all p<0.01). Among the frontline medical staff, the daily working hours were associated with all psychological disturbance (all p<0.01), women with anxiety (p = 0.02), body mass index (BMI) with anxiety and insomnia (p = 0.02, p = 0.03). Age was negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and insomnia (all p<0.01). Finally, years of working and family income were negatively associated with suicide risk (p = 0.03, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that during the outbreak of COVID-19, the frontline medical staff are more likely to suffer from psychological disturbances than general population. It is noticeable that daily working hours are a risk factor for all measured psychological disturbances, and some other variables may be involved in certain psychological disturbances of frontline medical staff.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections , Depression/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Pneumonia, Viral , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Workload , Adult , Age Factors , Anxiety/psychology , Betacoronavirus , Body Mass Index , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Income , Male , Mental Health , Patient Health Questionnaire , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Suicide , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL